Recent discussions among AI developers highlight significant advancements in model efficiency and cost reduction. One developer noted that integrating GPT into a platform called Godinabox resulted in a tenfold decrease in inference costs within weeks. This raises the possibility that training smaller models on compute-intensive tasks could lead to faster generation times on less powerful machines. However, there are concerns regarding data movement bottlenecks, which may limit the scaling of AI training runs to approximately 100 times beyond current models, with a theoretical maximum of around 1,000 times due to latency issues. Another developer shared their experience training a 200MB TinyGPT model on a coffee recipe database, demonstrating that smaller models can achieve capabilities comparable to larger ones, such as 1 billion parameter models, indicating a trend toward embedding intelligence directly into applications.
Soon we’ll have 100mb models as capable as today’s 1b models and at that point we can just embed intelligence in an app. I recently trained a 200mb TinyGPT model on a coffee recipe database and it can generate passable recipes from a simple ingredient prompt. For now it will be… https://t.co/IHweuzhZr2
I think this is an important and surprising result. Data movement bottlenecks could constrain efficient (high utilization) scaling of AI training runs to ~100x beyond current top models, with a hard limit around ~1000x due to latency constraints. https://t.co/bJ8gPkOEuK https://t.co/qnM0Khe9Lr
I think this is an important and surprising result. Data movement bottlenecks could constrain efficient scaling of AI training runs to ~100x beyond current models, with a hard limit around ~1000x due to latency constraints. https://t.co/wjlyR6hkcg https://t.co/qnM0Khe9Lr