RAG is definitely here to stay for a very simple reason: you won't ever be able to put the whole internet in a prompt, no matter the context length. https://t.co/uFIQ2hQ8Wd
RAG vs long context is the dumbest debate ever. You need long context for RAG to work better. The longer the context the more RAG chunks you can put into it. And no, the context will never be long enough.
The essential ingredient to RAG is superior chunking. But the latter can only be achieved through domain specific prompt engineering.
Recent discussions among experts highlight the importance of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in enhancing large language models (LLMs). A new method introduced by Meta, known as Meta-Chunking, aims to improve text division by grouping related sentences, thereby preserving logical flow between sentences and paragraphs. Experts emphasize that RAG not only helps in referencing sources but also offers advantages in cost and speed, particularly when processing large amounts of tokens. The debate surrounding RAG versus long context is noted as misguided, as longer contexts are essential for optimizing RAG's effectiveness. Overall, the consensus is that RAG is crucial for the future of LLMs, as it addresses inherent limitations in prompt engineering and context management.