Recent discussions among AI enthusiasts indicate that OpenAI's GPT-4o models are outperforming Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet in various tasks. Users have reported that while Claude 3.5 Sonnet can be effective for certain coding projects, it falls short in reasoning and general question-answering compared to GPT-4o. The GPT-o4 model also shows better performance in fixing typos. Furthermore, some users who switched to Claude have reverted to using ChatGPT due to dissatisfaction with Claude's rate limits. Overall, OpenAI's models are currently seen as superior in performance.
Is it true? Has #Claude 3.5 Sonnet really fallen behind the latest GPT-4o models and even 4o-mini? 🤔 Which model do you turn to first these days? #AIModels #GPT4o #Claude3_5 #TechTrends #AI https://t.co/40MipLV93i
Claude is never going to beat OpenAI with this. I know many people who switched from ChatGPT to Claude and then switched back to ChatGPT. I haven't met a single Claude user who is happy with rate limit. https://t.co/WyZH3pFwwm
Is this for real? Has Claude 3.5 Sonnet really slipped below the latest GPT-4o models and even 4o-mini? What model do you go to first, right now? https://t.co/FrRCVDfCOl