Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
Agreed. GPTs store was probably an attempt to find out what those under chatGPT's strength would most likely be used for. It's been more of a market analysis than a really useful product. To be honest, I think that OpenAI actually believed they would use the GPTs in the… https://t.co/ev6vd8RtCF
Surely one of the most useful tools, at least from an educational standpoint, are GPTs. And it seems that @OpenAI is not going to give them the proper priority. https://t.co/PLJGybTdod
I think the GPTs Store was initially intended for OpenAI to harvest training data from user interactions or as an early attempt at building out an agent ecosystem. But let's be honest, the GPTs that actually came out were pretty underwhelming. At some point, they probably… https://t.co/NXItnPgSxw
OpenAI's GPTs, launched nearly a year ago as a tool for organizations and educational purposes, have not seen significant updates or improvements. Despite initial excitement, the GPTs Store, which was intended to gather user data and build an agent ecosystem, has been perceived as underwhelming. Experts argue that the main issue is not the quality of the GPTs themselves but the lack of effective training and education on how to use them. This disconnect between marketing and practical application has led to limited adoption and utility of the tools. GPTs have been a main way to share valuable prompts/tools.
