UK regulator’s softened ‘name and shame’ plan unconvincing, lawmakers say https://t.co/VCjl783ic7
Another shambles for UK Regulators incoming.... https://t.co/n5T8PCLyuN
CAMPBELL: "We have a governance issue with banking regulation writ large. The fact that supervision is often confidential, hidden, and nobody knows exactly what happened, itself is a problem that leads to abuse." "Without addressing this, there will be hearings on Operation… https://t.co/aTYzJmalYC

UK lawmakers have expressed skepticism regarding the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) revised 'name and shame' plan, which aims to announce enforcement investigations prior to their conclusion. The Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee emphasized that this approach raises serious regulatory concerns, suggesting that 'naming and shaming' is not an effective regulatory strategy. Critics have pointed out that the FCA's handling of this plan has been inadequate, with calls for greater transparency in banking regulation. Campbell, a committee member, highlighted a broader governance issue within banking regulation, noting that the confidentiality surrounding supervision can lead to abuses. The ongoing criticism suggests that the FCA may face further scrutiny in the future regarding its regulatory practices.
