The U.S. Supreme Court has decided not to stay the EPA’s power plant rule, allowing the Biden-Harris administration to advance its climate change agenda. The rule, which aims to address climate change by regulating carbon emissions from power plants, has faced opposition from the energy industry, mining industry, and over 25 U.S. states, including West Virginia. Justice Clarence Thomas publicly dissented, while two other conservative justices, Brett Kavanaugh and another unnamed justice, also expressed concerns. The decision, part of the SCOTUS Opinion Relating to Orders on 10/16/2024, is seen as a significant step in the administration's efforts to combat climate change, despite the potential impact on jobs and the premature closure of power plants.
Supreme Court decision on Biden carbon regs offers tea leaves https://t.co/pmgM3pUGR3
A couple points in bold on this poorly decided SCOTUS decision to delay killing the EPA coal power plant rule: 1. "One justice, Clarence Thomas, publicly dissented." Thomas is always rock solid on holding EPA in check. 2. "Two other conservative justices, Brett Kavanaugh and… https://t.co/nvq4RYeXYs
SCOTUS Opinion Relating to Orders: 10/16/2024 - 24A95 West Virginia v. EPA https://t.co/6bNLYtsWEy