Compound DAO has recently experienced a significant governance attack, where a delegate successfully passed a proposal to allocate $25 million worth of COMP tokens for a yield farming initiative. The attacker managed to accumulate 682,000 COMP tokens to push the vote through, raising concerns about the vulnerability of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) to governance attacks. This incident highlights the need for more sophisticated DAO designs and governance safeguards. Various experts have suggested potential solutions, including veto committees, incentivizing governance participation, and implementing dual/multi-token voting systems. The attack has also sparked discussions on the importance of accruing value to governance tokens to prevent holder apathy and ensure active participation in governance. The incident has drawn attention to the role of major stakeholders, such as a16z, who had the power to prevent the attack but chose not to vote. Additionally, entities like ByBit and protocols such as zkSync and Penumbra have been mentioned in the context of governance improvements. The Bravo governor and Tally Protocol are also cited as potential frameworks for enhancing DAO security. This governance attack serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in DAO governance and the necessity for continuous improvement in security measures.