
The White House's initiative to combat 'junk fees' has sparked a series of reactions across various sectors. The Cato Institute published a piece titled "The Incoherence of the White House’s Anti- “Junk Fees” Agenda," criticizing the administration's agenda. Concurrently, the US Chamber of Commerce has filed a lawsuit against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) over its rule to cap credit card late fees at $8, a move criticized by the WSJ editorial page as "playing whack-a-bank" by turning banks into regulated utilities and harming consumers. The CFPB accuses business and banking groups, including the Chamber of Commerce, of 'forum shopping' for a favorable court in Fort Worth, Texas, to challenge the rule. The agency recently unveiled a final rule aimed at banning 'excessive' credit card late fees, leading to further legal challenges from the industry. Amidst this backdrop, discussions on service charges in the restaurant industry and the implications for tipping practices are also gaining attention, with opposing groups in Massachusetts considering legislation to address these concerns. Additionally, D.C. lawmakers voted to limit service fees at bars and restaurants to 20%.









Eating out in D.C. might be more expensive than the prices on the menu let on, thanks to service fees. But D.C. lawmakers voted this month to limit those service fees at bars and restaurants to 20%. Will it make a difference? https://t.co/2j2eisOJ8c
US regulator says trade groups judge-shopped for credit fee lawsuit https://t.co/KFQBKdzVqC https://t.co/LOZdjiFChN
CFPB Sued by Industry Over Credit Card Late Fee Rule https://t.co/d9AfEhi8Fz #CFPB #CreditCard #LateFee @BnkInfoSecurity https://t.co/12yF9w6kGm