The National Labor Relations Board has told a federal appeals court that a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling barring certain in-house agency enforcement proceedings has no effect on its powers to remedy illegal labor practices @DanWiessner https://t.co/s3oUSNZMDW https://t.co/j7U4YB7Cyz
The US Supreme Court’s ruling in Jarkesy, which limited some US agency enforcement proceedings, is already getting cited in cases involving the NLRB and the US Labor Department. Subscribe to The Daily Docket: https://t.co/BA6OgOU08N https://t.co/ruIhMcfU4E
H-1B lottery is too easily gamed. Here’s how to fix it https://t.co/WDoAcm55wh
A forthcoming ruling from a district court could potentially render nearly all laws governing private-sector labor relations unenforceable, according to legal experts. Employers are increasingly leveraging constitutional arguments to challenge the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which has seen some initial successes in these legal battles. In the past year, the NLRB has modified its criteria for evaluating workplace rules that may unlawfully restrict workers' organizing rights, complicating employers' defenses. The NLRB has also asserted that a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which limits certain in-house agency enforcement actions, does not diminish its authority to address illegal labor practices. This assertion is currently being tested in the courts, particularly in a case involving Macy's. Meanwhile, discussions around the H-1B visa lottery system continue, with critics arguing that its random allocation favors companies that exploit the system and undermines U.S. workers.