
OpenAI has issued a public response to a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk, revealing a series of communications that shed light on the dispute between the artificial intelligence research lab and its co-founder. According to the released emails, Musk had proposed merging OpenAI with Tesla in 2017 and again in February 2018, suggesting that OpenAI could serve as a 'cash cow' for Tesla. OpenAI's blog post, which includes contributions from Ilya Sutskever among others, refutes Musk's claims that the startup abandoned its original mission for profit. The company expressed sadness over the dispute with Musk, whom they once deeply admired. OpenAI also highlighted Musk's desire for 'absolute control' over the company, including demands for majority equity, initial board control, and to be CEO. Despite these demands, OpenAI has decided to move to dismiss all claims in Musk's lawsuit, emphasizing their commitment to making meaningful progress towards their mission without him.











































































The Tesla owner and OpenAI agreed that it needed to become a for-profit company, but disagreements popped up during negotiations. According to OpenAI, Mr. Musk wanted full control. https://t.co/BRdZeiJxZE
OpenAI and Elon Musk, blog post by @OpenAI https://t.co/pIQjAQa8O7
OpenAI on March 5 hit back at Musk's claims that the startup breached their founding agreement to develop AI for the benefit of humanity, rather than for profit, with emails that showed Musk supported its plan to create a for-profit entity https://t.co/XhuqrQK8rY https://t.co/ljaLILuzFh