Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
A case study on why censorship resistance actually matters. Get an upate on the Tornado Case from @ameensol, Co-founder @reflexerfinance: https://t.co/tmDid2LtoE https://t.co/5lJFM4I19U
I wrote a followup for @theragetech about deeper issues in Roman Storm's criminal trial re: Tornado Cash. Including: - Is code still protected speech? - Is there a constitutional right to financial privacy? The case could set important precedents for emerging tech and the law. https://t.co/fvzp7a3VHw
The Tornado Cash trial against Roman Storm is not a trial against one person. It is a trial against us all. Is the right to financial privacy protected by the US Constitution? And will code remain classified as free speech? Will we turn the law on its head by arguing that those… https://t.co/5Q68FJ22zg
The criminal case against Roman Storm, associated with Tornado Cash, is raising critical questions about the intersection of technology and constitutional rights. Central to the trial are issues such as whether computer code can be considered a form of speech protected under the First Amendment and if there is a constitutional right to financial privacy. The outcome of this case could set significant precedents for how emerging technologies are treated under the law, potentially impacting privacy, free speech rights, and censorship resistance in the digital age.
