This is a fundamental misunderstanding of what a stablecoin’s purpose is. A stablecoin does not need to scale to be an SoV for every person in the world. No asset can stay truly stable, they simply fluctuate or debase against more scarce assets (duh it’s called inflation). So… https://t.co/e1JfNj6rYT
A rather naive take. RWAs aren't "inferior crypto," they are superior versions of TradFi assets. So, a stablecoin isn't "worst crypto." It's "better fiat." The purists who argue for an isolated crypto-native economy don't understand how monetary systems work. The great ones… https://t.co/GS2OTtQ0JU
Bitcoin is the base currency of a new financial system that is unburdened by the poor choices that have plagued fiat capital for centuries leading to excessive monetary debasement Stablecoins are the natural extension of the dollar's ubiquity in every relevant market and unlock…
The stablecoin market, valued at approximately $200 billion, is positioned to challenge the $20 trillion Eurodollar market. Advocates argue that stablecoins, which are often backed by cryptocurrencies like Ethereum (ETH), represent a natural evolution of the dollar's dominance in financial markets. They assert that stablecoins can unlock new financial possibilities, acting as a bridge between traditional finance and decentralized finance (DeFi). However, some experts caution that creating a truly decentralized stablecoin that maintains a consistent 1:1 peg to the U.S. dollar is unlikely due to the greater demand for dollars compared to the demand for leveraged crypto assets. Critics also emphasize that real-world assets (RWAs) should not be dismissed as inferior to cryptocurrencies, suggesting instead that they can enhance traditional financial assets. The ongoing debate highlights differing perspectives on the role and potential of stablecoins in the evolving financial landscape.