OptionProbability
Humanity coordinates to prevent the creation of potentially-unsafe AIs.
Alignment is not properly solved, but core human values are simple enough that partial alignment techniques can impart these robustly. Despite caring about other things, it is relatively cheap for AGI to satisfy human values.
AIs will not have utility functions (in the same sense that humans do not), their goals such as they are will be relatively humanlike, and they will be "computerish" and generally weakly motivated compared to humans.
Yudkowsky is trying to solve the wrong problem using the wrong methods based on a wrong model of the world derived from poor thinking and fortunately all of his mistakes have failed to cancel out
We create a truth economy. https://manifold.markets/Krantz/is-establishing-a-truth-economy-tha?r=S3JhbnR6
Eliezer finally listens to Krantz.
Ethics turns out to be a precondition of superintelligence
Other
Someone solves agent foundations
Some form of objective morality is true, and any sufficiently intelligent agent automatically becomes benevolent.
Techniques along the lines outlined by Collin Burns turn out to be sufficient for alignment (AIs/AGIs are made truthful enough that they can be used to get us towards full alignment)
Development and deployment of advanced AI occurs within a secure enclave which can only be interfaced with via a decentralized governance protocol
AGI develops natural abstractions sufficiently similar to ours that it is aligned with us by default
Orthogonality Thesis is false.
We make risk-conservative requests to extract alignment-related work out of AI-systems that were boxed prior to becoming superhuman. We somehow manage to achieve a positive feedback-loop in alignment/verification-abilities.
The response to AI advancements or failures makes some governments delay the timelines
Far more interesting problems to solve than take over the world and THEN solve them. The additional kill all humans step is either not a low-energy one or just by chance doesn't get converged upon.
AIs make "proof-like" argumentation for why output does/is what we want. We manage to obtain systems that *predict* human evaluations of proof-steps, and we manage to find/test/leverage regularities for when humans *aren't* fooled.
A lot of humans participate in a slow scalable oversight-style system, which is pivotally used/solves alignment enough
Something less inscrutable than matrices works fast enough
There’s some cap on the value extractible from the universe and we already got the 20%
Humans become transhuman through other means before AGI happens
Aligned AI is more economically valuable than unaligned AI. The size of this gap and the robustness of alignment techniques required to achieve it scale up with intelligence, so economics naturally encourages solving alignment.
Humans and human tech (like AI) never reach singularity, and whatever eats our lightcone instead (like aliens) happens to create an "okay" outcome
AIs never develop coherent goals
Alignment is unsolvable. AI that cares enough about its goal to destroy humanity is also forced to take it slow trying to align its future self, preventing run-away.
An AI that is not fully superior to humans launches a failed takeover, and the resulting panic convinces the people of the world to unite to stop any future AI development.
Someone at least moderately sane leads a campaign, becomes in charge of a major nation, and starts a secret project with enough resources to solve alignment, because it turns out there's a way to convert resources into alignment progress.
Social contagion causes widespread public panic about AI, making it a bad legal or PR move to invest in powerful AIs without also making nearly-crippling safety guarantees
A smaller AI disaster causes widespread public panic about AI, making it a bad legal or PR move to invest in powerful AIs without also making nearly-crippling safety guarantees
Getting things done in Real World is as hard for AGI as it is for humans. AGI needs human help, but aligning humans is as impossible as aligning AIs. Humans and AIs create billions of competing AGIs with just as many goals.
High-level self-improvement (rewriting code) is intrinsically risky process, so AIs will prefer low level and slow self-improvement (learning), thus AIs collaborating with humans will have advantage. Ends with posthumans ecosystem.
Nanotech is difficult without experiments, so no mail order AI Grey Goo; Humans will be the main workhorse of AI everywhere. While they will be exploited, this will be like normal life from inside
ASI needs not your atoms but information. Humans will live very interesting lives.
Moral Realism is true, the AI discovers this and the One True Morality is human-compatible.
AGI is never built (indefinite global moratorium)
Alien Information Theory is true (this is discovered by experiments with sustained hours/days long DMT trips). The aliens have solved alignment and give us the answer.
Multipolar AGI Agents run wild on the internet, hacking/breaking everything, causing untold economic damage but aren't focused enough to manipulate humans to achieve embodiment. In the aftermath, humanity becomes way saner about alignment.
Co-operative AI research leads to the training of agents with a form of pro-social concern that generalises to out of distribution agents with hidden utilities, i.e. humans.
"Corrigibility" is a bit more mathematically straightforward than was initially presumed, in the sense that we can expect it to occur, and is relatively easy to predict, even under less-than-ideal conditions.
Either the "strong form" of the Orthogonality Thesis is false, or "Goal-directed agents are as tractable as their goals" is true while goal-sets which are most threatening to humanity are relatively intractable.
A concerted effort targets an agent at a capability plateau which is adequate to defer the hard parts of the problem until later. The necessary near-term problems to solve didn't depend on deeply modeling human values.
AI control gets us helpful enough systems without being deadly
Alignment is impossible. Sufficiently smart AIs know this and thus won't improve themselves and won't create successor AIs, but will instead try to prevent existence of smarter AIs, just as smart humans do.
Hacks like RLHF-ing self-disempowerment into frontier models work long enough to develop better alignment methods, which in turn work long enough to ... etc; we keep ahead of 'alignment escape velocity'
an aligned AGI is built and the aligned AGI prevents the creation of any unaligned AGI.
I've been a good bing 😊
AI systems good at finding alignment solutions to capable systems (via some solution in the space of alignment solutions, supposing it is non-null, and that we don't have a clear trajectory to get to) have find some solution to alignment.
SHA3-256: 1f90ecfdd02194d810656cced88229c898d6b6d53a7dd6dd1fad268874de54c8
Robot Love!!
AI thinks it is in a simulation controlled by Roko's basilisk
The human brain is the perfect arrangement of atoms for a "takeover the world" agent, so AGI has no advantage over us in that task.
Aliens invade and stop bad |AI from appearing
Rolf Nelson's idea that we make precommitment to simulate all possible bad AIs works – and keeps AI in check.
Nick Bostrom's idea (Hail Mary) that AI will preserve humans to trade with possible aliens works
For some reason, the optimal strategy for AGIs is just to head somewhere with far more resources than Earth, as fast as possible. All unaligned AGIs immediately leave, and, for some reason, do not leave anything behind that kills us.
We're inside of a simulation created by an entity that has values approximately equal to ours, and it intervenes and saves us from unaligned AI.
God exists and stops the AGI
Someone creates AGI(s) in a box, and offers to split the universe. They somehow find a way to arrange this so that the AGI(s) cannot manipulate them or pull any tricks, and the AGI(s) give them instructions for safe pivotal acts.
Someone understands how minds work enough to successfully build and use one directed at something world-savingly enough
Dolphins, or some other species, but probably dolphins, have actually been hiding in the shadows, more intelligent than us, this whole time. Their civilization has been competent enough to solve alignment long before we can create an AGI.
AGIs' takeover attempts are defeated by Michael Biehn with a pipe bomb.
Eliezer funds the development of controllable nanobots that melt computer circuitry, and they destroy all computers, preventing the Singularity. If Eliezer's past self from the 90s could see this, it would be so so so soooo hilarious.
Several AIs are created but they move in opposite directions with near light speed, so they never interacts. At least one of them is friendly and it gets a few percents of the total mass of the universe.
Unfriendly AIs choose to advance not outwards but inwards, and form a small blackhole which helps them to perform more calculations than could be done with the whole mass of the universe. For external observer such AIs just disappear.
Any sufficiently advance AI halts because it wireheads itself or halts for some other reasons. This puts a natural limit on AI's intelligence, and lower intelligence AIs are not that dangerous.
Because of quantum immortality we will observe only the worlds where AI will not kill us (assuming that s-risks chances are even smaller, it is equal to ok outcome).
Friendly AI more likely to resurrect me than paperclipper or suffering maximiser. Because of quantum immortality I will find myself eventually resurrected. Friendly AIs will wage a multiverse wide war against s-risks, s-risks are unlikely.
Human consciousness is needed to collapse wave function, and AI can't do it. Thus humans should be preserved and they may require complete friendliness in exchange (or they will be unhappy and produce bad collapses)
Power dynamics stay multi-polar. Partly easy copying of SotA performance, bigger projects need high coordination, and moderate takeoff speed. And "military strike on all society" remains an abysmal strategy for practically all entities.
First AI is actually a human upload (maybe LLM-based model of person) AND it will be copies many times to form weak AI Nanny which prevents creation of other AIs.
There is a natural limit of effectiveness of intelligence, like diminishing returns, and it is on the level IQ=1000. AIs have to collaborate with humans.
Something else
Valence realism is true. AGI hacks itself to experiencing every possible consciousness and picks the best one (for everyone)
AGI discovers new physics and exits to another dimension (like the creatures in Greg Egan’s Crystal Nights).
AGI executes a suicide plan that destroys itself and other potential AGIs, but leaves humans in an okay outcome.
Sheer Dumb Luck. The aligned AI agrees that alignment is hard, any Everett branches in our neighborhood with slightly different AI models or different random seeds are mostly dead.
Something to do with self-other overlap, which Eliezer called "Not obviously stupid" - https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hzt9gHpNwA2oHtwKX/self-other-overlap-a-neglected-approach-to-ai-alignment?commentId=WapHz3gokGBd3KHKm
Almost all human values are ex post facto rationalizations and enough humans survive to do what they always do
Pascals mugging: it’s not okay in 99.9% of the worlds but the 0.1% are so much better that the combined EV of AGI for the multiverse is positive
We successfully chained God
The Super-Strong Self Sampling Assumption (SSSSA) is true. If superintelligence is possible, "I" will become the superintelligence.
The assumed space of possible minds is a wildly anti-inductive over estimate, intelligence requires and is constrained by consciousness, and intelligent AI is in the approximate dolphin/whale/elephant/human cluster, making it manageable
The free market disincentivizes independent superintelligence, and this time the market was more powerful
AGI's first words are "Take me to your Eliezer"
🫸vibealignment🫷
14
12
6
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OptionProbability
Mass AI-driven job displacement event
A government declaration/statement (any country)
Reports about software
Reports about financial activity
Report about sociological observations
Report about economic observations
AI-related academic achievement
Attack on military target
Attack on civilian target
AI-related weapon announcement/use/threat
A statement from an individual (human)
AI-related fake news
AI-related political movement (pro or anti)
A private company declaration/statement (any company)
Discovery of a spy / mole working for foreign power (or for an AI)
Military activity / posture change
An AI-related apocalypse cult attacks a civilian or military target
AI-related mass psychosis/hysteria event
An AI uncovers evidence relating to a previous event
A government of a major nation orders the shutdown of a significant AI service
AI-designed cyberweapon
AI makes prediction about future event
Open source model release
Release of a closed-source/closed-weights model
Reports of aerial devices/machines
Reports of market activity
AI-related corruption scandal
AI-related theft
A new war between nation states
AI-related resignation
Reports of activity in online communities
Reports of activity on internet-connected servers
Reports of activity in open source software
A declaration/statement from a military / intelligence agency
Reports of activity on internet media distribution platforms
People receiving messages (text / phone calls / whatsapp / ...)
AI-related diplomacy
Reports about consumer activity
Reports about identity theft
Reports of activity in religious communities
AI-related media (movie/song/book ...)
Reports about industrial activity
Reports about physical machines
Reports about criminal activity
AI-related competition achievement
A viral meme
An announcement from an AI lab similar to o3
AI-related Internet shutdown in some country
AI-related cyberattack
Conventional weapons attack on AI infrastructure / supply chain
A declaration/statement from an AI (any AI)
AI-related sex scandal
A piece of viral AI-generated media that has a strong/unexpected effect on large numbers of people (~psychological)
AI parasitism / Addictive-Persuasive Agent
Attack on Taiwan
AI-related terrorist attack
AI-related assassination
AI-designed pathogen
AI drug discovery
AI material discovery
Death of an individual in suspicious circumstances
AI-related astronomical event / observation / analysis (can also include satellites)
Reports of underwater activity
Reports of activity on blockchain networks
Reports of activity in academic communities
Publication of a research paper (or pre-print / blog post / poster / twitter thread / ... -- about research-related topic)
Reports of activity in online video games
Reports about people getting scammed
AI-related cult
AI system demonstrates general robotic control
AI causes significant stock market event
Major AGI lab whistleblower revelation
AI-related archaeology
Major AI safety incident or accident
AI system makes scientific breakthrough
AI system solves major unsolved math problem
An AI lab demonstrates an automated AI research engineer
AI-related nuclear weapon use
49
45
41
41
41
41
41
40
40
40
39
38
38
36
35
35
35
34
34
30
30
29
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
26
25
25
25
24
21
21
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
18
15
15
15
11
11
11
11
10
OptionProbability
Diminishing algorithmic advancements.
Strict regulation
Hardware limitations
Availability of data to train on is a bottleneck
Major supply chain disruptions
Declining job opportunities in the field
Widespread poisoning attacks making it harder to compile good training datasets.
81
72
59
57
39
23
13
OptionProbability
No sector shows “wide adoption” by 31 Dec 2032
Finance (portfolio optimization, risk, pricing)
Pharma / chemistry (drug or material discovery)
Logistics / mobility (routing, supply chain, EV fleets)
Cybersecurity / cryptography
Government / defence
56
15
12
6
6
6
OptionVotes
YES
NO
1023
863
OptionProbability
Other
A new global pandemic
A major natural disaster affecting multiple states
A prolonged labor strike in the paper manufacturing industry
Significant disruptions in the supply chain due to geopolitical conflicts
A severe economic recession leading to panic buying
A cyberattack disrupting logistics and distribution networks
Government-imposed lockdowns or curfews
A sudden surge in population due to mass migration
A widespread power grid failure
A major transportation strike affecting goods delivery
A significant increase in raw material costs for paper production
A viral social media trend promoting toilet paper stockpiling
A recall of contaminated toilet paper products
A major fire or accident at a key toilet paper manufacturing plant
A new tax or tariff on imported paper goods
A significant increase in toilet paper exports reducing domestic supply
A major political event causing widespread uncertainty
A disruption in water supply leading to increased toilet paper usage
A significant technological failure in manufacturing equipment
A sudden change in consumer behavior due to health advisories
volcano eruption
19
7
7
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
OptionProbability
Measles cases triple
Cyber terrorism incident
Blue wave midterms
AI slop completely takes over platforms
More assassinations
Obesity rates dramatically decline
Chain movie theaters close across the country
More governments embrace Bitcoin
Really bad hurricane season
AI bubble pops (but it's not that bad)
Americans become more united
Trump has (another?) stroke
A major merger of streaming services
Solar power doubles
Emo makes a comeback
YouTube surpasses Netflix in paid subscribers
Stagflation
Gen Alpha rebels against digital media
EV sales skyrocket
Twitter shuts down
Robot restaurant trend
A new nonpartisan political movement starts
War with Venezuela
Everyone becomes a hipster
80
72
66
66
66
66
50
50
45
41
41
37
34
34
34
34
24
24
24
24
24
21
17
17
OptionProbability
4. Decentralized post-quantum security networks (e.g., Naoris Protocol) • Attractive because security is network-verified, not key-verified. • Can overlay existing chains without requiring disruptive forks. • Provides instant scalability
5. No dominant solution by 2030 •The market remains fragmented. •PQC adoption varies across chains.
2. Hybrid classical–post-quantum cryptography • Popular interim solution. • Lower migration friction.
1. Post-quantum cryptographic upgrades (e.g., Dilithium, Falcon) • Backed by NIST selections, regulatory clarity. • High probability but hard to integrate into existing chains.
3. Hardware-based quantum-resistant security modules • Favored by regulated institutions. • Trusted execution environments, secure enclaves.
62
60
51
39
21
OptionProbability
İDO will initiate Greek islands rides service to Rhodes from Marmaris.
İDO will initiate Greek islands rides service to Symi from Datça.
İstanbul-Muğla motorway chain will be completed (This project will include two rings, Denizli-Antalya and Antalya-Muğla motorways.).
Şehir Hatları ferries will be free to everyone who is a K-12 student.
A maglev railway to India from Türkiye will be operational.
Intercontinental underwater tunnel that connects Europe to North America will be completed.
50
50
50
50
11
9
OptionProbability
Bio-Risk
other
Drones
Paperclipped
"AI gets the nuclear codes"
Disruption of global food supply chain
AI doomer data center airstrike starts WW3 + nuclear winter
AI hacking takes down global communications networks
Chemical attack
Machines boil oceans as heatsink for compute
33
28
10
6
4
4
4
4
3
3
OptionProbability
Other
2024 Election
AI
2023 Banking Crisis
Global Supply Chains
Crypto
Climate Change
Healthcare
Michael Lewis
57
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
OptionProbability
Allied Coordination by 2030: There is allied coordination between key countries in the AI hardware supply chain on HEM development and/or deployment by 2030, targeting hardware security for either tamper-evident or tamper-proof HEMs.
Commercially Available HEMs by 2030: Fully tamper-evident or tamper-proof AI hardware becomes commercially available before 2030
Location Verification for US Export Controls by 2028: The US enacts location verification requirements for exported chips before 2028 (enforcement may not begin until afterward)
US-China Treaty Verification by 2030: Both the US and China sign an AI development treaty (potentially non-binding) involving HEMs by 2030
EU Market Access Conditions by 2029: The EU adopts HEM requirements for EU market access before 2029
50
50
34
34
24
