DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
OptionVotes
YES
NO
30821
3245
OptionVotes
YES
NO
11108
518
OptionProbability
If the X platform was used primarily as a decentralized mechanism for minting Krantz data, kids could earn a retirement before the age of 23 by getting a sovereign education independently.
People should be paid for the beneficial data they produce to align AI.
People should be paid for the beneficial data they produce to align the government.
We can measure the variance in confidence between any two intelligent agent's finite list of various propositions they've evaluated.
Analytic philosophers have had a mechanistically interpretable process (analytic reasoning) for aligning each other for thousands of years.
Analytic arguments can be contained in constitutions.
If someone has a different confidence than you for a specific proposition in Krantz, you should add an argument to Krantz that compels them to update their beliefs.
Getting paid for analytically reasoning within a decentralized constitution is the same thing as getting paid to align ASI.
Krantz can decentrally align humanity while controlling disclosure and acheive game theoretic parity of rational agents.
The term "krantz" refers to the open market of all well formed propositions that we compete to assign confidence and importance parameters to in order to provide a basis for alignment.
Krantz is an abstract living idea that can be communicated with.
This is a convenient place to deny the argument from Krantz - https://manifold.markets/Krantz/which-proposition-will-be-denied?r=S3JhbnR6
If 'Krantz' as an idea is more disruptive than Bitcoin was, then all the batshit crazy predictions @krantz has made make more sense.
There’s more to life than AI alignment
A generally expansive and complete map of the logical connective structure of all knowable reasoning is critical to interpretable alignment.
Krantz is aimed at rapidly scaling a generally expansive and complete map of the logical connective structure of all knowable reasoning.
Danny Sheehan deserves a Nobel Peace Prize.
A solution to defining Wittgenstein's perfect language is the instrumental mechanism that is sufficiently capable of defining truth in a way that interpretably aligns AI decentrally.
This is printing money.
The founding fathers understood how to align artificial superintelligence (by allowing individuals to vote on a decentralized constitution).
We should krantz (the process of evaluating Krantz).
We should know whether we are aligned with each other.
Aligning Krantz (the constitution of all propositions) is the last job humans need to do.
The process of "fairly aligning AI" is the same process as "fairly voting on a consistent language".
If we build mechanistically uninterpretable superintelligence, everybody dies.
I consent to having my opinions, which have been verified by me within krantz, to be used in natural law petitions to advocate on my behalf.
If everyone can prove what they want government to do, we wouldn't need a government.
What it means for "humanity to be aligned" is what it means for "all of humanity to agree to the confidence of every proposition they have ever thought of".
For any degree N that you want an AI to be aligned, there exists K an amount of Krantz data that can interpretably acheive that alignment.
If we communicated with each other like analytic philosophers instead of continental ones, it would be obvious how 8 billion people should go about aligning artificial superintelligence.
The primary economic mechanisms in the world should be aimed at determining whether propositions are true.
If we recorded every proposition on a blockchained ledger that we allowed everyone to express their confidence on, we would all communicate orders of magnitude better and solve all the problems in a transparent public domain.
Wiggenstien's compatabilitism is correct and every philosophy/religion is an accurate expression of truth (natural law) in a unique imperfect language.
All other jobs (given adequate robotic infrastructure) can be done by an agent performing the subtask of evaluating propositions.
The "particles" in the standard model are actually just abstract points in flat space that represent modular series of events.
The standard model is a finite subset of the infinite set of modular events that exist.
We should all be aligned with each other.
Krantz is a culture of language movement.
We can stop further dangerous scaling of ML based AI if Eliezer Yudkowsky listens to Krantz.
Aliens are real.
If someone allows ASI to be grown, they are either not in control of the planet or incompetent.
A congressman's primary job is to survey his constituency on what actions he should take.
It will be a philosopher of language that aligns AI.
Aliens being real is more important for the public to know than the existential risk of ASI.
If competent people are in charge, they will not allow ASI to be grown.
The X platform could easily be converted into a decentralized school that secures a job and means for competition for everyone in a post labor economy.
It's worth paying people to vote on these because it's really helpful to see everyone's opinion.
If Krantz is a man AND all men are logical THEN Krantz is logical.
Artificial superintelligence is a paraphrase of a society effectively communicating via the krantz mechanism.
An ideal economy directly rewards valuable contributions and verification of a decentralized ledger of record that everyone can access and work for.
If you can think of important facts that should be evaluated, you should put them here.
Our social contract should retroactively reward contributions to the public domain.
The rules that define the operation of this function can be defined within the function.
This system should allow the construction of arguments where each proposition is a link to another proposition on the list.
The X platform should be an open feed of propositions like this such that any humanity verified person can earn credit for defining a confidence and importance.
Natural law entitles humans the right to define propositions like this on a decentralized ledger such that if they are important to society, then society will have the means to reward that declaration.
If there were a decentralized constitution (like this) that every human could freely and securely add propositions to and vote their confidence and importance on, then government, corporations and money would be obsolete.
Providing input to this function (at scale) is the only job we need to maintain autonomy from superintelligence.
We ought build a school that fairly pays citizens to learn how to be good citizens AND this is a function that does that THERFORE we ought build this.
This is what the founding fathers wanted (a collective state controlled by a constitution that everyone can vote on instead of representatives that make decisions for us).
We have the technology to allow everyone citizen to directly vote on the constitution.
These propositions ought have primary keys that can be referenced in logical expressions.
The distinction between 'growing' ASI (using trillions of dollars of GPUs and oil) and 'training' ASI (using krantz collective reasoning) is important.
Krantz data is money.
This is what the X feed ought look like (a feed of propositions that we can earn money for evaluating), because that would allow us to communicate more effectively as a society.
We could be printing our own money by communicating well.
If a decentralized interpretable superintelligence paid individuals to answer true/false questions that help it align the truth, it could use that truth to control the world.
What it means for two intelligent agents to "be aligned" is what it means for two intelligent agents to "have zero variance between their confidences of every proposition they have ever thought of".
The max anyone should wager on a given proposition is 100 because your wager is intended to represent your confidence.
The Universe is infinite, continuous, and filled with infinite consciousness.
The purpose of life is to communicate.
Evil is a specific form of communication (primative).
Humans ought focus on mining krantz data instead of coprimes.
If we can prove people will not do bad things in the future, there is no reason to punish them for bad things they have done in the past.
The only justified fear, is the fear of ignorance (partial knowledge).
Intellectual full spectrum dominance is the most noble aim.
If we had a tremendous amount of krantz data, we could use a simple interpretable gofai algorithm to determine the most beneficial proposition a given user ought evaluate next (based on the variance of their ontology with society).
You can map full strings of complex arguments (like the entirety of Fermat's last theorem) on a system of this nature.
Intelligent agents evolve through 4 specific forms of peer control (communication) first is physical, second is reputational, third is emotional, and forth is rational.
There is a hierarchy of communication (4, lowest) physical (3) reputation (2) emotional (1, highest) rational.
The reason we punish people for doing bad things is to prevent them from doing bad things in the future.
The speed limit of light is a property intrinsic to the particles in the standard model and doesn't apply to non-standard particles.
Society Library has the most generally expansive and complete map of the logical connective structure of all knowable reasoning.
Manifold should consider these changes.
The ultimate moral good is to communicate.
If we simply allowed every real person to securely evaluate every interpretable fact and treated that data as money, all other problems could be solved instrumentally using that process.
We can prove what we want government (or a superintelligence) to do.
The bitcoin community should buy X from Elon and convert it into a decentralized school that gives people abstract points for doing philosophy.
ASI would not kill everyone if we actually trained it.
Money only has value if other people understand why it has value.
CYCCORP has the most generally expansive and complete map of the logical connective structure of all knowable reasoning.
The message of krantz is being suppressed because it is not understood properly.
If our intellectual labor is not fairly rewarded, we are not truly free.
Aligning AI is an infinite task (it can't be acheived, only approximated).
Open immigration should be allowed into the US.
The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture is true.
The Hodge conjecture is true.
In three space dimensions and time, given an initial velocity field, there exists a vector velocity and a scalar pressure field, which are both smooth and globally defined, that solve the Navier–Stokes equations.
The Riemann hypothesis is true.
P = NP
Yang–Mills theory exists and satisfies the standard of rigor that characterizes contemporary mathematical physics, in particular constructive quantum field theory.
The mass of all particles of the force field predicted by the Yang-Mills theory are strictly positive.
If we all share the same confidence for every proposition, we are all aligned with each other.
Wittgenstein's perfect language meets the worthy successor criteria.
My congressman ought be responsible for acknowledging my expressed opinions and acting in accordance with them.
Induction is not justified. (Hume's problem)
Nature is uniform. (principle of uniformity in nature)
Aliens are real and we are in a simulation to learn how to communicate.
We can measure whether two intelligent agents are aligned.
ASI would kill everyone if we actually grew it.
Abortions are ethically bad.
Abortions should be illegal.
P(doom) is less than 0.1.
Our information economy allows poor people to insert important ideas into the public domain such that others will find them if they ought to.
The electron is a point particle.
The Krantz mechanism cannot map this premise.
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
94
94
93
91
91
91
90
90
90
90
90
90
89
89
88
87
86
82
81
81
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
78
77
76
76
76
76
76
75
73
73
73
72
72
72
66
61
61
60
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
47
41
40
34
30
28
22
20
4
OptionVotes
YES
NO
481
21
OptionProbability
Understands existential risk from AI.
Likes finding out that she is wrong about stuff.
Is insatiably curious.
Open minded enough to go to contact in the dessert.
Is super into taboo philosophy.
Open to moral sexual deviance and drug use.
Wants to have kids and teach AI how to tolerate them.
Wants to live in Austin, TX.
Wants to visit and explore a wide array of decentralized city projects (Zuzula, Cabin, etc).
Likes to attend Lessonline and Manifest.
Likes to go to burning man.
Wants to help organize an 8 billion person online intellectual orgy by integrating surveys into decision markets in a way that allows sovereign individuals to mint their own nonfungible assets by interpretably defining alignment criteria.
Likes to be submissive.
Is into esoteric history.
Works in AI.
Likes to listen to Danny Jones and Jesse Michels.
Is a global skeptic that only believes what she can prove.
Likes to adopt dogs that need rescued.
She is obsessed with mapping the logical connective structure of ever interpretable proposition that is definable.
Will be less than 90% confident that 'there isn't an ontologically shocking explanation to the UFO phenomenon'.
Likes to attend philosophy conferences and talk about Kant, Hume, Wittgenstein and Diogenes.
Like to meditate twice a day.
Prefers a primarily meat based diet.
Works at Society Library.
Is familiar with gofai (specifically Danny Hillis and Doug Lenat's work).
Is ambitious enough to try to control the world.
Thinks decision markets are the key to sovereignty.
Wants to study at Network School.
Likes >2hr of rigorous exercise per day.
Can survive in the woods.
She will be @JamieJoyce.
Voted for RFK Jr.
She will be @Aella.
Works in the IC.
95
94
94
90
90
90
90
85
85
82
82
82
78
76
76
76
71
70
69
66
65
64
64
64
63
52
51
44
43
35
34
30
24
10
OptionProbability
By Jan 1, 2028
By Jan 1, 2035
By Jan 1, 2040
By Jan 1, 2026
By Jan 1, 2027
By Jan 1, 2030
By Jan 1, 2029
By Jan 1, 2025
96
96
96
94
94
92
91
0
OptionVotes
YES
NO
139
104
OptionProbability
I'm serious about my other predictions.
Humanity should pivot from (converting oil into artificial intelligence capabilities) to (converting mechanistically interpretable human cognitive labor into decentralized constitutional parameters for guiding collective intelligence).
It would be helpful if every important thought leader had a prediction similar to this to formalize their positions on complicated issues.
Aligning AI is a job everyone should have the right to earn a living by doing.
I am trying to pay you to help me map my beliefs.
I'm trying to get people to help me write the constitution of truth for AI.
This is Krantz data.
Krantz data is money.
I believe everybody doing this is the solution to alignment.
We could turn X into a machine that allows us to print our own crypto by doing philosophy and arguing about literally everything.
I am challenging all the analytic philosophers on Manifold to an argument about whatever topic they choose.
The main thing we need to do to solve alignment and game theoretic peace is to get all the important philosophers in the world to start talking in analytic English instead of continental English, so we can map our language properly.
Wiggenstien was right the first time and everyone's personal truth is compatible.
Financial and physical oppression and war are side effects of not being able to communicate effectively.
If we simply allowed every real person to securely evaluate every interpretable fact and treated that data as money, all other problems could be solved instrumentally using that process.
If the X platform was used primarily as a decentralized mechanism for minting Krantz data, kids could earn a retirement before the age of 23 by getting a sovereign education independently.
If Americans had the right to express their support (or opposition) for each proposition of the constitution (both securely and publicly in a way that can be operated on), we wouldn't need politicians.
If all humans had the right to vote on the constitution that controls AI, AI would be decentrally controlled by a market of opinions.
If humans could print their own money by voting on propositions that control AI, education would be economically accelerated several orders of magnitude.
The solution to aligning ASI is really simple.
Krantz has the most important message to give to society. https://manifold.markets/Krantz/which-person-had-the-most-important?r=S3JhbnR6
Krantz is the abstract composition of all the data that would be contained in a collection of predictions like this from every thought leader.
67
63
61
53
51
51
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
45
OptionVotes
YES
NO
227
44
OptionVotes
YES
NO
158
63
OptionProbability
2026
2031 vagy később
2025
2027
2029
2030
2028
2024
45
12
8
8
8
8
7
4
OptionProbability
A Living President
An Eagle
None of the above
Lady Liberty, Columbia, etc.
An animal other than an Eagle
A Dead President
Female person other than Lady Liberty/Columbia/etc
Male person other than a president
46
33
6
5
4
2
2
2