Useless News

5-Kid gives up

6-Kid does his best to re enter the race to the one piece(invalid if number 3 happens)

1-Useless Mid is dead

7-Other

4-JIKA COMES BACK AND BEATS SHANKS

3-Kid will be trained by Shanks and/or giants

This one.

A machine that pays people crypto to consent to propositions being true.

A machine that pays people crypto to take surveys about how they feel about the news.

A machine that pays people crypto to earn credentials.

Paying people to test seemingly useless products (e.g. non-stick glue).

I. AI soon hits fundamental scaling laws and we go into another AI winter.

A. Death by paperclips, eternal torment of all humans by AI, or similar unalignment catastrophe.

F. AI wipes out most jobs as in D. People not forced into mind-uploads or experience machines. General perception that AI has made life more meaningful/fulfilling&improved the human experience on dimensions other than hedonium maximization.

G. AI development continues but doesn't change things too much, somehow. Most jobs, even low-level white collar jobs, don't get impacted too hard, as new work is found to replace newly automated work. Labor force participation remains high.

B. Governments and/or other powerful entities use AI as a tool of repression, enabling global techno-totalitarianism along the model of China during Zero Covid or worse.

C. AI doesn't actively want to hurt us, but (possibly aided by transhumanists) they become obsessed with utility maximization and force us all into mind-uploads and/or experience machines to free up resources for more computronium.

D. AI wipes out most white-collar jobs within a decade and most blue-collar jobs within a generation; powerful humans and/or AIs at least seriously consider disposing of the "useless eaters" en masse, us being powerless to resist.

E. AI wipes out most jobs as in D. No disposing of the human masses, but general perception that AI has made life less meaningful/fulfilling & significantly worsened the human experience on dimensions other than hedonium maximization.

YES

Total success: accurately and credibly predicts land values and property values

Meh: predicts property values and land values, but is more or less identical in performance to what the status quo assessments in Philadelphia already generate

Partial success: predicts property values and land values, but the error margin is really wide

Partial success: accurately and credibly predicts property values, but not land values

Failure: ship something, but it's broken garbage and the results are inconclusive or useless

Fail to ship anything at all

YES

YES

YES

NO

YES

NO

no

yes