A German court has dismissed a decade-long climate lawsuit filed by a Peruvian farmer against the German energy company RWE. The farmer sought to hold RWE accountable for its global emissions, which he argued increased the risk of glacial floods in his hometown of Huaraz, Peru. While the court rejected the farmer's specific claim due to insufficient evidence of direct damage, it established a legal precedent by affirming that companies can be held civilly liable for climate-related harms caused by their emissions. This ruling marks a notable development in climate litigation, signaling that large emitters may face future accountability in civil courts for their contributions to climate change.
An example of a loss being a win: a German court rejects a climate case against the energy giant RWE because the damage in this case was not great enough but rules that companies CAN be held liable in civil court for their contributions to climate change. https://t.co/caVeuOTVGb
Niederlage & Sieg zugleich: Das OLG Hamm wies die Klimaklage eines peruanischen Bauern gegen RWE ab, erkannte aber erstmals an, dass Großemittenten grundsätzlich für Klimaschäden haftbar sein können - Rechtsexpertin Jannika Jahn zu den Hintergründen. https://t.co/D2Lp39z1u3
German Court Ruling Opens Path to Hold Polluters Accountable for Climate Crisis https://t.co/QULuq5hXAs