The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently rejected the biologics license application (BLA) for RP1, an experimental skin cancer therapy developed by Replimune Group. The decision has drawn criticism from the melanoma research community, which has expressed confusion over the rejection and collectively sent an open letter to the FDA. Reports indicate that Rick Pazdur, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence and the agency's top regulator of cancer drugs, played a key role in the last-minute rejection during the late stages of the therapy's review. This intervention contributed to the unexpected denial despite the therapy's potential for treating melanoma. Some former FDA officials clarified that Vinay Prasad, previously criticized for his stringent review approach, was not substantively involved in this decision. In response to internal concerns, new FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) head George Tidmarsh has been meeting with staff to reassure them and has committed to depoliticizing regulatory decisions, although he acknowledged that political pressures remain a factor. Tidmarsh and other FDA leaders are reportedly working to restore normal operations amid ongoing internal challenges.
Top drug regulator George Tidmarsh assured Food and Drug Administration staff this week that he and other leaders are trying to bring operations back to normal. https://t.co/YTyyzMXhvw
'Struggling' FDA employees ask about unusual meetings and staffing https://t.co/NIbxVtZeqk
Some interesting comments from new FDA CDER head in recording I obtained. He promised to keep politics out of his decisions BUT said he couldn't insulate the center from political pressures from above. "I can always be overturned, which is fine." https://t.co/nFJTWrbNFk