A growing number of cryptocurrency users and industry observers have expressed strong opposition to Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations, criticizing the process as intrusive and harmful. Many argue that KYC, originally established under the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 and expanded by the Patriot Act after 9/11 to link identities to financial transactions, was designed more for surveillance than user protection. Critics claim that KYC requirements expose personal data to criminals, increasing the risk of targeted thefts and violent crimes against individuals holding significant cryptocurrency assets. Concerns have also been raised about the extensive personal information demanded by KYC processes and the uncertain security of this sensitive data. Some voices in the crypto community call for abolishing KYC entirely, while others acknowledge the need for measures to prevent money laundering but question the current implementation. Coinbase, a leading cryptocurrency exchange, has been specifically mentioned in discussions about potential data breaches and the risks posed to its customers. Industry experts suggest that the problem lies not with KYC itself but with how it is executed and the human factors involved. The debate continues on whether crypto companies can or should eliminate KYC requirements, with some suggesting alternative solutions to balance compliance and user privacy.