Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
New York Supreme Court Ruling Highlights Legal Boundaries in Environmental Regulation: Greenidge Generation v. NYS DEC https://t.co/SpiIyTGL6q #NewYork #Environmental #Litigation @GT_Law https://t.co/N5Ixa2zNB6
In a pivotal day for New York climate policy, two State Supreme Court judges ruled on Thursday that New York must enforce stricter climate laws on energy projects, including those tied to crypto-mining. https://t.co/Mat0LEI7QC
Unexpected Court Ruling Raises Substantial Questions About National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Regulations https://t.co/r5Fd7l5pXX #Environmental #Government #Laws @allenmatkins https://t.co/AuNcFQdHTj
A federal appeals court has ruled that the White House's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) lacks the authority to issue binding regulations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), overturning over 46 years of environmental regulations. This ruling came in the case of Marin Audubon Society, et al v. FAA, et al, where the DC Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the CEQ cannot impose binding NEPA regulations. The decision, made by a three-judge panel, has significant implications for federal agencies, which are now expected to have more flexibility in complying with NEPA. Additionally, the ruling has raised substantial questions about the future enforcement of environmental regulations.
