A recent federal court ruling has made it easier to remove administrative law judges from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The ruling, issued on December 10, 2024, states that certain judges can be removed without cause, thereby eliminating a layer of protection that previously safeguarded them. This decision is part of a broader legal context where courts are also reassessing their deference to agency interpretations of law, particularly in cases concerning state criminal verdicts and habeas corpus. Legal experts, including Columbia Law's James Liebman, have commented on the implications of this ruling, suggesting it may limit the courts' ability to defer to state court decisions regarding constitutional challenges. Additionally, some commentators have expressed concerns that the ruling could hinder law enforcement efforts in various areas, including combating fentanyl trafficking and securing the border.
Commentary: An Obama Judge Just Made It Harder for Law Enforcement to Fight Fentanyl, Secure the Border, and Fight Terrorists https://t.co/d8KJeOKkRT
Judge Strikes Part of Federal Law, Making It Easier to Remove ‘Powerful’ Judges https://t.co/bvblSohpAJ
Opinion: Columbia Law's James Liebman says new curbs on US courts’ deference to agency interpretations of law also keep US courts from deferring to state court readings of the US Constitution in habeas corpus cases challenging state criminal verdicts. https://t.co/nJuKcewqO1