The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that invalidated several claims of a Qualcomm Inc. patent, which the court had previously upheld. This ruling emphasizes the importance of corroborated conception in determining co-inventorship and clarifies the criteria for what constitutes prior art in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. Specifically, the court noted that published patent applications are considered prior art as of their filing date, impacting the evaluation of written descriptions against claims. The Federal Circuit's decision reflects ongoing developments in intellectual property litigation and the standards applied in patent disputes.
Complex or Not Written Description Is Evaluated Against Claims https://t.co/HbHbFoh4jJ #Patent #Litigation #Federal @IP_Planet @ipdotcom https://t.co/ufDh8Gd3Nh
The Federal Circuit said Friday it won't undo a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision that invalidated several claims of a Qualcomm Inc. patent it had previously upheld. https://t.co/sx5xfS2c3r https://t.co/CbQdc48XDe
A Lynk to the Past: Published Applications Are Prior Art as of Filing Date https://t.co/CQIWb9nBhi #IntellectualProperty #Litigation #Federal @WTRmagazine @CopyrightOffice https://t.co/rPVVXApDId