A recent ruling by the en banc Fifth Circuit has upheld the controversial application of the 'favorable termination' requirement to non-custodial plaintiffs, deepening a persistent circuit split. The case in question, Wilson v. Midland, involved a Texas woman seeking damages over a 23-year-old drug conviction marred by prosecutorial misconduct. The court's decision, which was divided (9-3-6), necessitates that plaintiffs must show 'favorable termination' of their convictions to proceed with their claims. Judge Don Willett, who penned a dissent joined by five colleagues, argued that this requirement should only apply to prisoners bringing claims analogous to malicious prosecution. The ruling has sparked significant debate, with critics labeling the rule as 'bonkers'. Jacqueline Thomsen of Bloomberg Law reported on this case (subscription required).
ICYMI: Judge Don Willett, joined by five colleagues, argued that the favorable termination requirement only applies to prisoners who bring claims analogous to malicious prosecution. https://t.co/0Be5lM50fl
“Full Fifth Circuit Rejects Suit Over Prosecutor’s Clerkship; En banc court said woman must show ‘favorable termination’; Lawsuit said prosecutor worked on case while a law clerk”: Jacqueline Thomsen of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required https://t.co/8UFiCOxmkw
This week the en banc 5th Cir. confirmed (9-3-6) its “bonkers” rule that Heck’s favorable-termination requirement applies to non-custodial plaintiffs in @IJ case Wilson v. Midland. Judge Willett penned a moving dissent, highlighting the circuit split. https://t.co/O5QvJos6Iq https://t.co/S0Rib2Pl3f https://t.co/mOYLVcIi9t