A Missouri judge has barred James Hurst, a partner at Kirkland & Ellis, from making arguments on behalf of Abbott Laboratories in a significant trial concerning the safety of infant formula for premature babies. The judge sanctioned Hurst for 'overtly crossing the lines' in his professional conduct during the proceedings. As a result, he is prohibited from presenting evidence or delivering closing arguments for the remainder of the trial. The litigation involves claims that formulas from Abbott and Reckitt's Mead Johnson have caused severe intestinal illness in infants. Plaintiffs' attorney Timothy Cronin has requested more than $6 billion in punitive damages from the companies, raising concerns among medical professionals about the potential impact on the availability of these formulas and medical decisions regarding their use. Jurors in Missouri have begun deliberations in this high-stakes case.
Jurors in Missouri have begun deliberations in the first NEC trial against both Mead Johnson and Abbott over prenatal infant formula. Plaintiffs' lawyer Timothy Cronin asked for $6 billion in punitive damages.
'Companies have to clearly and unambiguously tell us the truth about their products, especially those intended for the smallest and most vulnerable human beings,' a lawyer told the jury in the preterm formula case against Abbott and Mead Johnson https://t.co/AnTv36R4IJ https://t.co/iZvMih7KW9
A Kirkland & Ellis partner who "overtly crossed the lines" drew a sanction in Missouri and finds himself banned from presenting evidence or closing arguments for the remainder of the infant formula trial. ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ: https://t.co/6DAFBEibxU https://t.co/pI1PnwLuvP