Legal experts across the political spectrum have expressed concern over the Trump administration's legal tactics, describing them as a willingness to disregard statutory and constitutional limits. Seven prominent legal minds, including Lawrence Lessig, Ed Whelan, Andrew McCarthy, Jedediah Adler, Ilya Somin, Aziz Huq, and Michael W. McConnell, agree that these actions constitute lawfare and require swift restraint. Meanwhile, there is growing unease within federal agencies about the administration's use of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to target corporate law firms as a form of retaliation. This has sparked debate within the legal community about the response of major law firms, with some criticizing their perceived capitulation to Trump. Questions have arisen regarding whether top law firms' agreements with Trump represent necessary survival strategies or detrimental compromises to the legal profession's integrity.
Donald Trump has two goals: to seek revenge and to intimidate lawyers challenging his agenda. Is a top firm’s deal with him a necessary act of survival or a damaging blow to the entire profession? https://t.co/NSs5J7Q0Mx
“Angst Builds Inside Federal Agency Over Trump’s Moves Against Law Firms; The Trump administration has deployed the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in its effort to seek retribution against corporate law firms”: Jessica Silver-Greenberg, Matthew https://t.co/Mea7HfM05o
Let’s Talk About Biglaw’s Capitulation To Trump https://t.co/iS62EAknOK