Column: Louisiana hurricane victims try to revive claims against litigation funders https://t.co/oMKdSQF3bS @AlisonFrankel https://t.co/sDvzFaszEK
Louisiana hurricane victims try to revive claims against litigation funders https://t.co/M22rupG9mk https://t.co/3pBBk1AAYh
What did litigation funders know? That's the question a federal judge will have to answer in a lawsuit accusing a Texas law firm of improperly soliciting Louisiana hurricane victims to file cases against insurance companies. Read @AlisonFrankel's column https://t.co/oMKdSQF3bS https://t.co/0rFimo9RJJ
A Texas magistrate judge's recommendation to drop litigation funding companies from a lawsuit has been challenged. The lawsuit involves a proposed class of Louisiana hurricane victims who allege that a Texas law firm deceptively solicited them to file claims against insurance companies. The victims argue that the litigation funders must have been aware of the law firm's alleged misconduct. The case raises critical questions about the knowledge and involvement of litigation funders in such schemes. Additionally, the Department of Justice has provided insights that could influence a separate case regarding $42 million in Russian assets, complicating the legal landscape for victims of a Taliban attack in Afghanistan.