Sources
shadowA path forward for Blast @PacmanBlur could theoretically pause/roll back the chain right now, but there are legal implications to that beyond the reputation stuff. The longer you wait, however, the more drastic the action needed for a solution. It's far better to take swift…
samridh.ethThis is an interesting question: definitely unpopular move if they did this, but so is losing $62M of user funds if users on Blast signed on for full decentralization, this would be a violation but if they understood it be a centralized L2 (as it was advertised, 3/5 multisg),… https://t.co/xMRli1raTz
Adam HollanderAt this point, if @PacmanBlur intervenes, he'd be seen as a hero and users would feel indebted to him. If he doesn't, those same users will feel betrayed. Because technically their funds can be returned and Blast would be making a conscious decision not to. Just because the…

