Some Ethreum-land big issues - many undifferentiated L2s - confusing for builders, why build on 1/ all L2s? - confusing/ annoying for users - capital fragmentation for traders - centralization reality - mainnet builder(s) - L2 sequencers how is this wrong?
TL;DR - Chain abstraction and smart wallets are reviving the 2017 @jlppfeffer thesis on ETH being working capital and suffering from the velocity problem. Imo this means one of two things. 1) All L1 tokens are extremely overvalued and should be valued on the basis of fees (MEV,… https://t.co/8qKErO3bWn
something about the whole ‘abstract away the crypto’ path the entire industry is going down worries me a bit we see ETH as money but will the rest of the world? https://t.co/AUaReE5HEl
The cryptocurrency industry is experiencing significant shifts with the advent of new-generation wallets like Infinex, OneBalance, and Coinbase Wallet. These wallets are bringing economic abstraction into practice, a concept that faced criticism about a decade ago. General-purpose blockchain networks, or public mainnets, are trending towards rollups with minimal sequencer fees, while purpose-driven chains are moving towards sequencer marketplaces. The industry is also grappling with issues such as undifferentiated Layer 2 solutions, which create confusion for builders and users, and capital fragmentation for traders. Additionally, there are concerns about the centralization of mainnet builders and Layer 2 sequencers, raising questions about the future of Ethereum and its valuation. The industry is also debating whether Ethereum will be seen as money and the implications of the velocity problem.