
One year after major AI companies made voluntary commitments to self-regulate under White House guidelines, a review by MIT Technology Review highlights mixed progress. While some companies have adopted improved practices, the assessment indicates a lack of meaningful transparency and accountability in their efforts. The findings suggest that the voluntary commitments are insufficient to ensure responsible AI development, raising questions about the effectiveness of self-regulation in the sector.
One year after major AI companies agreed to a set of voluntary White House commitments to develop AI in a safe and trustworthy way, @techreview assesses their progress — and finds some improved practices, but no meaningful transparency or accountability. https://t.co/f5eOvfwNKW
How's AI self-regulation going? | MIT Technology Review https://t.co/MpwnMQHgXD
AI companies promised to #selfregulate one year ago. What’s changed? https://t.co/4kRUhXg0bK #regulation #GenAI #AI @Melissahei @techreview @DeepLearn007 @ahier @HaroldSinnott @DioFavatas @MariaFariello1 @Shi4Tech @Nicochan33 @joemckendrick @pierrepinna @YuHelenYu @sallyeaves…