Recent experiments in machine learning have highlighted the potential benefits and limitations of using synthetic data for training language models. Yuchenj_UW conducted a study using GPT-2 (350M) models, revealing that while synthetic data can initially boost performance, it tends to underperform compared to hybrid data approaches. The study involved training four GPT-2 models with synthetic data for 100 billion tokens using Cosmopedia v2. The findings suggest that hybrid data, which combines synthetic and real data, results in stronger models. This aligns with observations that synthetic data alone may lead to repetitive patterns, which could hinder model performance. The debate continues on the efficacy of synthetic data, with some experts noting that the difference between the best and worst configurations is minimal.
Our cofounder @Yuchenj_UW’s experiment shows that “HYBRID DATA over pure synthetic data”. Can’t wait to see more AI research and findings come from our platform! https://t.co/7AVAU6v4s5
a different take on this: - what is called "synthetic data" is actually "data sampled from a stronger LM than what I am currently training" - the diff between the best and worst configs is very small so my read is: training on samples is only a bit worse than training on real https://t.co/71B3C50mM8
Apparently pretraining on synthetic data alone boosts performance at the beginning but then it underperforms any other option.. Very interesting results Curious to know what exactly causing this I suspect it might be repetitive strings"sure! here is a paragraph about" & so on https://t.co/kUkpdDlEw3