
An Elsevier paper authored with the assistance of ChatGPT has gone viral for being published without detection of its AI origins, sparking a wide discussion on the efficacy of peer review in the academic publishing process. This incident has led to a broader conversation about the role of AI in content creation, with various AI tools like HyperWriteAI and Anthropic's prompt library being highlighted for their capabilities in generating up-to-date information, natural writing styles, and providing templates for common use cases. The situation underscores the challenges and potential pitfalls of integrating AI into professional and academic writing, as well as the importance of vigilance in the review process to maintain the integrity of published research.

The best prompt since ChatGPT came out https://t.co/Z2WmWkDEay
ChatGPT's biggest issue is it sounds like a robot. But there is a secret that will teach you to write like you in just a few minutes. Transform ChatGPT into your writing doppelgänger!🧵👇 https://t.co/HsRu1c8dFn
ChatGPT prompt reply copy-pasted in a published research paper. https://t.co/NGlx6BJ8FM