The American Bar Association (ABA) has introduced a new set of core principles and values outlining its law school accreditation process amid ongoing scrutiny of its regulatory role. Among the changes, the ABA now encourages law schools to accept applicants without requiring LSAT scores, signaling a potential shift in admissions standards. This move has sparked debate about whether the ABA is responding to public criticism or masking discriminatory practices. Critics, including legal scholars and former officials, argue that the ABA should not hold exclusive authority over legal education and suggest that state regulators explore alternative accreditation pathways. The discussion reflects broader concerns about ideological diversity and the future governance of legal education in the United States.
7 Essential Skills Every 1L Must Develop ASAP https://t.co/eheztnQm8L
“As state regulators consider rules to undo the ABA’s monopoly over legal education, we must confront what has become increasingly clear: The ABA does not deserve this power over the training of American legal professionals.” https://t.co/PD3HDdBkRo
"The ABA does not deserve this power over the training of American legal professionals. States would do well to provide alternative avenues for law schools to demonstrate their ability to train future lawyers — outside the control of the ABA." https://t.co/Mf1Wb0Lo9n