Beyond just requiring Apple to allow third-party app stores, Japan's new anti-trust regulations will also force Apple to allow third-party browsers on iPhone starting in December. By @Amber_M_Neely https://t.co/fLMYaETAVd
🚨🚨Google’s antitrust suit: SC admits cross appeals 📌📌 A bench comprising Justice PS Narasimha and Justice Atul S Chandurkar said it will hear the case in November. By Indu Bhan Read more at: ⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/Zhv2vRhagf
The EU has the tools to break up Google’s ad tech business. So what’s holding them back? Damien Geradin tells @JavierespBX it’s not just legal—it’s political. Full interview via @Capitol_Forum 🎥👇 https://t.co/X67n8TgbJ2 https://t.co/vFJ0rVegc7

A U.S. appeals court has upheld a 2023 jury verdict against Google in the antitrust case brought by Epic Games, ruling that Google engaged in anticompetitive practices by maintaining a monopoly over the Android app store. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a unanimous decision requiring Google to open the Android platform to rival app stores and implement significant changes to its Play Store. This ruling marks the first time since 2001 that a major tech firm has lost an appeals court decision on monopolization. Meanwhile, Google faces additional antitrust scrutiny in the advertising technology sector following a Department of Justice liability ruling. Internationally, Japan has introduced new regulations mandating Apple to permit third-party app stores and browsers on iPhones starting in December. The U.S. Supreme Court has also admitted cross-appeals related to Google's antitrust case, with hearings scheduled for November. In the European Union, legal and political considerations are influencing potential actions to dismantle Google's ad tech business.
