The recent decisions from the Federal Circuit have significant implications for intellectual property enforcement and patent litigation in the United States. The Lashify decision has expanded the definition of 'domestic industry' at the International Trade Commission (ITC), which could enhance IP enforcement strategies to protect U.S. domestic industry. Additionally, the Federal Circuit addressed issues of appellate standing and prior art determinations in post-grant review proceedings. In a separate case, AMP Plus v. DMF, the court affirmed that the petitioner did not demonstrate that a recessed lighting system for buildings would have been obvious in light of prior art related to marine applications. Furthermore, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has been directed to consider the entire record when determining the status of prior art. These developments highlight the evolving landscape of patent law and its impact on both litigation and enforcement strategies.