Jamie Raskin and Dems Were in Favor of Going After Federal Judges Before They Were Against It (WATCH) https://t.co/z4ARokFecV
LAWFARE: Rep Jamie Raskin was for maligning judges he disagreed with before he was against condemning those judges he agreed with. https://t.co/zqmmLiwLE7
Top Dem on Judiciary Cmte Raskin accuses GOPers on venue shopping for cases. But when it comes to ruling against Trump administration "now that they've changed their tune and suddenly they say, 'Well, we don't think that federal court order should apply nationally, even if you're
Recent discussions among U.S. lawmakers have highlighted a shift in attitudes towards judicial rulings, particularly in relation to the Trump administration. Republicans have expressed approval of court injunctions that block Obama and Biden policies, but are now criticizing similar actions taken against Trump. Representative Jamie Raskin, a prominent Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, accused Republicans of engaging in 'venue shopping' for favorable cases and suggested that they are attempting to undermine judges whose rulings they oppose. Raskin's comments reflect a broader concern among Democrats regarding the perceived hypocrisy in how judicial decisions are treated, especially when they conflict with partisan interests. He emphasized the dangers of targeting judges based on their rulings, indicating that such actions threaten the integrity of the judicial system. The discourse raises questions about the balance of power and the respect for judicial independence in the current political climate.