The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear two new cases in its upcoming term, focusing on significant legal issues. One case, Ellingburg v. United States, will examine whether the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act can be applied retroactively, a matter that has created a divide among federal and state courts. The second case, Villarreal v. United States, addresses the constitutionality of barring a defendant from discussing their testimony with an attorney during a trial recess. This case raises questions about the Sixth Amendment rights of defendants and their access to legal counsel during critical trial phases. The court's decision on these matters could have far-reaching implications for criminal law and defendants' rights.
The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday it will take up the Sixth Amendment case of a man convicted of murder who was not allowed to consult with his lawyer about his testimony during a 24-hour break that came in the middle of his time on the stand. https://t.co/C1ZzPKotLJ
Here are three cases to watch as the Connecticut Supreme Court's next term begins Wednesday. https://t.co/XcVcUVswCh https://t.co/9qHvbWxWmq
The Supreme Court will review what counsel for a convicted bank robber called a "deeply entrenched" circuit split over the constitutionality of a federal law that requires criminals to continue paying restitution with interest for decades after conviction. https://t.co/VFVVaskrMQ https://t.co/wkARPaNsbc