The Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (STF) has established what its president, Luiz Roberto Barroso, described as the world's most advanced regulation for social media platforms, setting parameters for the accountability of digital platforms. Minister Alexandre de Moraes emphasized the necessity of regulating social networks and holding major technology companies responsible, noting that freedom of expression has been misused to justify illicit activities. Moraes also linked big tech companies to the events of January 8, underscoring the STF's regulatory approach as an example for the world. This judicial stance has reportedly influenced former U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to impose retaliatory measures against Brazil, with some U.S. allies viewing the STF ruling as contrary to freedom of expression. Additionally, a study by USP, UnB, and FGV revealed that Brazilian federal, state, and municipal governments spent R$9.3 billion in one year on products and services from big tech companies, challenging the notion that Brazil lacks resources to invest in technology. Privacy advocates, such as Cindy Cohn from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, warn that tech companies' cooperation with government requests is crucial to prevent excessive surveillance and repression.
A INFLUÊNCIA DAS BIG TECHS NO BRASIL | TVGGN JUSTIÇA (11/07/25) https://t.co/SHjOPMudOX
“A lot of our privacy … rests on tech companies saying ‘no’ ... when the government comes with an illegal order,” EFF’s Cindy Cohn told @MercNews. If they don’t, “it can really empower the government to do a lot of surveillance and a lot of repression.” https://t.co/FXALlV1vZ7
Em um só ano, os governos estaduais, municipais e o federal gastaram R$ 9,3 bilhões com produtos e serviços fornecidos pelas chamadas Big Tech, aponta levantamento da USP, UnB e FGV. O montante desmonta a tese de que o Brasil carece de recursos para investir em tecnologia e ainda