How in the F'ck is a BIKE LANE an immutable, fundamental, human right in Canada ....but protecting your home and family from intruders at 3AM isn't?? What kind of INSANE mental gymnastics is this?? https://t.co/SBAaBwaLfk
Poilievre says "the law needs to be clear" when it comes to "criminal thugs" committing home invasions: "you need to be able to do whatever is necessary to stop them." "If you don't want to be harmed, then don't invade someone's house and don't threaten their security," he adds. https://t.co/usRRtOtca8
✍️ Canada's 'reasonableness' standard for self-defence only makes sense if courts share the public's sense of right and wrong Home invasion is serious. The law of self-defence should reflect that | Jamie Sarkonak https://t.co/hMkr6DLFQj https://t.co/QTOgC7OQSG
Canada’s rules on the use of force in self-defence came under renewed scrutiny after Kawartha Lakes resident Jeremy McDonald was charged with aggravated assault and assault with a weapon for stabbing alleged burglar Michael Kyle Breen during a 3 a.m. home invasion earlier this month. Breen, who faced outstanding warrants, was airlifted to a Toronto hospital and remains in custody; McDonald is due back in court on Sept. 25. Under the Criminal Code, Canadians may use only “reasonable” and “proportionate” force, a threshold defence lawyers say is often misunderstood. Toronto attorney Kim Schofield cautioned that lethal or escalating force becomes illegal once an intruder attempts to flee, noting, “There’s no vigilante justice.” The case has ignited political reaction. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre argued on 25 Aug. that the law must be explicit so residents can “do whatever is necessary” to repel violent intruders, while Ontario Premier Doug Ford earlier called the charges evidence of a “broken system.” The debate follows other high-profile trials in which homeowners faced lengthy legal battles despite ultimately avoiding or reducing convictions. Opposition lawmakers are expected to press the Liberal government when Parliament resumes next month to clarify the Criminal Code’s reasonableness test, although Ottawa has not indicated plans to reopen the statute. For now, legal experts say the McDonald proceedings will serve as a bellwether for how courts balance public safety with limits on the use of force.