Recent legal developments have emerged regarding trade dress and litigation privilege as clarified by the Federal Circuit in the case of Toyo v. Atturo. Key takeaways from this case highlight important legal doctrines that may influence future litigation strategies. Additionally, the UPC Court of Appeal has denied a request for discretionary review, emphasizing the court's strict adherence to procedural rules. In the realm of intellectual property, discussions have surfaced regarding the jurisdictional challenges in e-commerce copyright disputes, particularly in relation to China. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has also indicated that solo representation is now permitted, alongside automatic pro hac vice admission, which could streamline processes for legal practitioners. Furthermore, the implications of contributory infringement have been examined, suggesting that if a provider is aware that their product will be used to infringe, they may be held liable. These developments reflect ongoing changes in the legal landscape affecting intellectual property and litigation practices.