
Legal experts are reacting strongly to the Supreme Court arguments on Trump's immunity claim. Trump's lawyers argue for full presidential immunity, suggesting a president could be immune even for actions against political opponents. Various legal scholars and commentators are weighing in on why the Supreme Court should reject Trump's immunity claims, with some calling the argument 'bogus' and 'dangerous.' Former Army Major Ojeda expresses concerns about the implications if military members were to carry out such actions.
One of Mr. Trump’s legal defenses, a claim of “absolute immunity,” is already pending before the Supreme Court with a ruling expected early this summer. https://t.co/nEzrfmzyrw
A Legal Scholar Explains Why Trump’s Immunity Argument Is Bogus https://t.co/DKLiJUxohe
The special counsel made a dangerous argument about Trump immunity, James M. Burnham writes. https://t.co/EluKwXfpvZ


