Recent discussions within the cryptocurrency community have raised concerns over MakerDAO's decision to increase its risk exposure, with some analysts suggesting it could lead to a higher cost of capital and demand for yields from Dai holders. Critics argue that MakerDAO, known for its stablecoin Dai, is shifting towards riskier strategies akin to those of a hedge fund, diverging from its traditionally conservative approach. This shift has sparked debate over its potential to cause significant damage to the ecosystem, especially in adverse market conditions. Additionally, a recent move to mint 1 billion Dai, representing 20% of the total supply, into a new, untested protocol without adequate risk mitigation and relying on weak oracles has been described as reckless. Proposals to reduce the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of Dai on lending platforms like Aave have been put forward as a measure to address these concerns.
1B $DAI - minted out of thin air (20% of whole supply) -into a non-battle tested protocol -with zero risk mitigation -weak oracles in less than a month -for asset hyper sensible to market conditions is the definition of reckless Will propose LTV reduction of DAI in Aave today
not sure how i feel about dai going up the risk curve. kinda always liked how it had been rather safe and conservative but my gut tells me that this has a lot of potential to cause significant ecosystem wide damage when (not if) the market nukes, which is exactly when susde will… https://t.co/B7xCyvbcH8
“Maker is now just a hedge fund” Y’all know that in the DAI whitepaper it describes the ability of MKR voters to add any kind of collateral asset and manage the risk parameters, right? Maker has always been about replicating the function of a bank (accepting deposits, extending… https://t.co/hCgKGhsyQE