Cursory thoughts RE: the Samourai Wallet indictment 1. Noncustodial P2P software is not a money service business. Putting aside the question of how SW's founders intended their platform to be used, their software should not be classified or regulated as if it were an MSB. As…
ATTACKS on #Bitcoin CONTINUE! With Samourai founders arrested, the FBI’s WARNING about non-KYC money transmitting services, and Phoenix Wallet exiting US app stores.. Is Government paving the way for a CBDC dystopia and a sequel to 6102? Dante brings the heat and the HOPE.👇 https://t.co/qpfknLiOX4
I wrote this about the absurd indictment of the Tornado Cash founders, and it applies perfectly today to the same charge being brought against @SamouraiWallet. The DoJ is seeking to create expansive new laws through prosecution, instead of via legislation. https://t.co/N2DLqXlx1K
The recent indictment of Samourai Wallet's founders has sparked a significant debate regarding the legal classification of non-custodial privacy tools like Samourai Wallet as money service businesses (MSBs). Legal experts and commentators are discussing the implications of this classification under U.S. law, with opinions varying from it being a reasonable categorization to an overreach of legal boundaries. This case is seen as setting a precedent for how similar privacy-focused financial tools might be treated legally in the future. Additionally, the broader implications for financial privacy and the rights to private, self-hosted financial services are being hotly debated, amidst concerns that this could lead to more stringent control over personal financial transactions by states. The indictment notes that the "defendants knew it was a haven for criminals," linking it to other cases like Tornado Cash, and coincides with actions like Phoenix Wallet exiting US app stores.