Mark never claimed anyone endorsed hitler, shithead. This was the quote in your "interview": "One could make the argument we should have sided with Hitler and fought Stalin" Mark said: So now we should've backed hitler? What's the issue, shithead? https://t.co/kd4Ckrux9S
Tucker's "Putin is the good guy and also Hitler was just misunderstood" tour continues. The online right has a deep crackpot problem because it is so obsessed with "the elites are lying to you" conspiracy narratives that it ends up embracing dangerous buffoonery like this. https://t.co/3FYNSwfMoT
One of the claims he makes is that if the Allies had sided with Hitler this would have somehow prevented the Holocaust? https://t.co/odQZ50HtoD
On August 21, 2025, Tucker Carlson faced widespread criticism after a guest on his show suggested that the commonly accepted narrative of World War II is incorrect and argued that the United States should have sided with Adolf Hitler instead of the Allies. The guest stated, "One can make the argument that we should have sided with Hitler and fought Stalin." Carlson appeared to agree with this revisionist perspective, which sparked condemnation across media outlets and public figures. Critics highlighted the dangerous implications of revising historical facts about World War II and the Holocaust, questioning the rationale behind such claims. The controversy also drew attention to Carlson's broader pattern of promoting contentious and conspiratorial views, including previous statements that appeared to defend Russian President Vladimir Putin. Defenders of the guest clarified that the argument was framed as a hypothetical revisionist stance rather than an outright endorsement of Hitler. Nonetheless, the episode intensified debates over historical interpretation and media responsibility.