The Annals of Internal Medicine said it will not retract a large Danish study after U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. demanded the journal withdraw the paper, which examined the safety of aluminum adjuvants in childhood vaccines. Kennedy, a longtime critic of vaccination policy, described the research as "deceitful" and alleged methodological flaws. Published in July and funded by the Danish government, the study analyzed health-registry data for more than 1.2 million children over two decades. It found no evidence that cumulative exposure to aluminum-containing vaccines increased the risk of autoimmune, allergic or neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism and asthma. Editor-in-chief Dr. Christine Laine told Reuters, "I see no reason for retraction," adding that the journal will address external comments on its website. Lead author Anders Peter Hviid of the Statens Serum Institut defended the work, noting that Denmark’s 2 percent unvaccinated population was too small for meaningful comparison and that individual-level data cannot be released under Danish law. Independent specialists praised the scale and design of the research. Adam Finn called the dataset "massive" and of "high-quality," while Johns Hopkins physician Amesh Adalja said the study’s limitations do not undermine its conclusions. The dispute underscores Kennedy’s broader effort to reassess federal immunization guidance, a stance that continues to draw pushback from mainstream scientific circles.
WATCH: News host claims COVID vaccines were proven safe and effective — and RFK Jr. spends two full minutes explaining why she’s wrong. • Over 5,000 peer-reviewed studies documenting injuries • Encouraged the virus to mutate and prolonged the pandemic • “Turns your body https://t.co/STQo9tzNJG
Dr. William Makis Drops BOMBSHELL on Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccines – "This Isn't Just Shedding, It's FORCED VACCINATION" The next generation of mRNA vaccines isn't just dangerous—it's uncontrollable. Dr. William Makis, a leading voice in medical integrity, reveals the https://t.co/PNDoBVfcOR
Dr. Paul Offit’s Flawed Defense of mRNA Vaccines—Here’s What He Gets Wrong Dr. Paul Offit has been one of the most vocal defenders of COVID mRNA vaccines, but a closer look at his arguments reveals troubling gaps in logic—and a dismissal of real-world concerns. 1. “The https://t.co/iynOfgWkMV