From Oops to Encore: The Board’s Premature Adverse Judgment https://t.co/3RVc1hLNZs #patent #trademark #patents #USPTO @KathiVidal1 https://t.co/hYVJAEnUGl
From Oops to Encore: The Board’s Premature Adverse Judgment https://t.co/xHwDxgQikJ | by @mcdermottlaw
David-Versus-Goliath Trademark Victory Isn’t “Exceptional” https://t.co/kodIFXj2U8 | by @mcdermottlaw
The Federal Circuit has revised the standard for determining obviousness in design patents, a significant shift that could impact future patent litigation. This change was highlighted in a recent article by legal expert Loren Pierce and Daniel Murray from Bressler Law, which discusses the implications of drafting inadequate reservation of rights letters. Additionally, a recent trademark case described as a 'David-versus-Goliath' victory was deemed not 'exceptional' by legal analysts, indicating that such outcomes may not set a precedent for future cases. Another article examined the Board's premature adverse judgment, suggesting that procedural missteps can lead to significant consequences in patent and trademark disputes.
