
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is under scrutiny for its approach to tech regulation, particularly its use of the 6b authority. Observers have noted the FTC's increasing alignment with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in its regulatory methods, a trend referred to as 'FCC-ization.' The FTC has been criticized for its characterization of certain practices as 'surveillance,' although some experts argue this term is inaccurate. The agency has also emphasized that hashing personal information does not render it anonymous, warning companies against making deceptive privacy claims. This stance has been supported by historical warnings from former Chief Technologist Ed Felten, who stated that hashing does not reduce data sensitivity. FTC commissioners MHolyoak and AFerguson have made concurring statements on these issues. Additionally, the FTC's understanding of adtech schemes to hash identifiers has been highlighted as a significant point.
"In 2012, former Chief Technologist Ed Felten wrote a... blog titled 'Does Hashing Make #Data ‘Anonymous’?'... [T]he answer is no, it does not... The warning was (and continues to be) clear: do not rely on hashing to reduce data sensitivity": https://t.co/7WFMbn9pCJ #privacy #FTC
Love FTC making it clear they understand that adtech schemes to “hash” identifiers are a tired scheme, still a unique identifier, and in the case of an email address more difficult to purge than a cookie. Not the future but literally clinging on to the past. https://t.co/vb55jUKre0
FTC seems to get the technical definition right; Simply hashing data items doesn't make it anonymous ("Regardless of what they look like, all user identifiers have the powerful capability to identify and track people over time ..") https://t.co/qqD4vvJQMv
