Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
The House v. NCAA settlement proposal would put unprecedented restrictions on NIL collective deals. However, industry stakeholders tell FOS they believe the restrictions themselves would lead to more lawsuits. @achristovichh's story ⬇️
From @usatodaysports: Lawyers for plaintiffs in NCAA compensation case unload on opposition to deal https://t.co/acNvHCyk57 via @CJOnline
Hagens Berman law firm, one of the lead plaintiffs in the House v. NCAA settlement, released a lengthy statement in response to numerous objections to the settlement’s preliminary approval process. Hearing is scheduled for Sept. 5. Full statement is here: https://t.co/eAo5kfhUXM https://t.co/A4CnGEVZiJ
The House v. NCAA settlement is facing significant opposition, with the Hagens Berman law firm, a lead plaintiff, issuing a detailed statement in response to numerous objections. The settlement proposal aims to impose unprecedented restrictions on Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) collective deals. However, industry stakeholders express concerns that these restrictions could lead to further legal challenges. A hearing on the settlement is scheduled for September 5.
