
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has implemented a less stringent climate disclosure rule for public real estate companies, exempting them from tracking tenant emissions. However, the new regulations still impose significant disclosure requirements. Scholars and researchers are questioning the validity of studies linking ESG practices to financial performance, with some suggesting a reverse causality. Despite the SEC's revised rule, finance chiefs are facing challenges and costs to comply. Three states are suing over the SEC's climate change rule, citing concerns over cost, purview, and the First Amendment. Meanwhile, there is a slowdown in new flows towards ESG funds, and sustainability-linked bonds have decreased as corporate bond issuance rises.
"Whether the government requires it or not, greenhouse gas disclosures are here to stay" (@TheHillOpinion) https://t.co/Gt1OBcc9Py https://t.co/NJxJgp3XCV
As corporate bond issuance booms, sustainability-linked bonds have plummeted. Some say the SEC’s new climate rule could help eventually https://t.co/UdKgAsEuRq via @WSJ @kcbroughton
The SEC is due to respond to a request from energy industry providers Liberty Energy and Nomad Proppant to pause new agency rules requiring some companies to report climate-related risks. More in The Daily Docket: https://t.co/pPL94IoOxp Subscribe: https://t.co/jDp2Zvzsw0 https://t.co/ceI4twZHvj






