The Supreme Court of India has criticized the Madhya Pradesh High Court for its decision to terminate female judges, emphasizing that the circumstances surrounding their dismissals were not adequately considered. The court highlighted the case of a female judge who had suffered a miscarriage, had a brother diagnosed with cancer, and was also diagnosed with Covid-19. The Supreme Court's remarks included a pointed statement suggesting that if men experienced menstruation, they would better understand the challenges faced by women, underscoring the need for sensitivity in such matters. This ruling has drawn significant attention to the treatment of women in the judiciary and the implications of their health issues on employment decisions.