Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
The Supreme Court of India has issued a stay on a recent order by the Lokpal, the country's anti-corruption ombudsman, which asserted its authority to entertain complaints against sitting High Court judges. The Supreme Court described the Lokpal's decision as 'very disturbing' and initiated suo motu proceedings, sending notices to the Centre, the Registrar of Lokpal, and the complainant involved. The court emphasized the importance of judicial independence and directed that the complaint against the High Court judge be kept confidential. Legal experts have noted that the Lokpal's move appears erroneous, as High Court judges hold constitutional positions and are not subject to Lokpal's jurisdiction without prior permission from the Chief Justice under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Supreme Court stays Lokpal's order regarding jurisdiction over High Court judges What the Lokpal did appears erroneous. There are established checks and balances when questioning the conduct of a High Court or Supreme Court judge: @advkapilsankhla tells @Anchoramitaw https://t.co/6sWLy5mtok
SC stays Lokpal order giving itself jurisdiction over HC judges As per current laws, investigating a judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act requires prior permission from the Chief Justice. However, while judicial independence is crucial, we also need a more credible… https://t.co/xXfMxAk2IE
SC stays Lokpal order giving itself jurisdiction over HC judges High Court judges hold constitutional positions, not statutory ones, and cannot be brought under the Lokpal’s jurisdiction: @advkapilsankhla https://t.co/2uu2Tng0s6
