The Supreme Court of India is set to address critical issues surrounding women's property rights as outlined in the Hindu Succession Act of 1956. A two-judge bench has referred the matter to a larger bench, noting that different interpretations of the Act have significant implications for women's rights and pending claims. This decision comes amid ongoing discussions about religion-based quotas, particularly in relation to a challenge from the West Bengal government against a Calcutta High Court ruling that struck down the grant of Other Backward Classes (OBC) status to 37 classes, predominantly from the Muslim community. The Supreme Court emphasized that reservations cannot be based on religion, highlighting the complexities of the quota system and its impact on various communities, including the Panchamasali community in Karnataka, which is currently engaged in protests over reservation demands. The situation has led to tensions, with some communities opposing the Panchamasali reservations, arguing that they are already a well-off group.
#KarnatakaQuotaWar | Panchamasali are very powerful and forward communities. Over the time, they have enjoyed the benefits; they should now let other communities come out and take these benefits: @rkupadhya9, Senior Journalist #SensationalSouth | @harishupadhya https://t.co/GFiwKOf02k
#KarnatakaQuotaWar | The reservation given to minority community (muslims) was not based on religion. Panchamasali is a rich, powerful, and well-to-do community, according to the data. They don't need the support: @LavanyaBallal, Congress #SensationalSouth | @harishupadhya https://t.co/UBiWmFonQ4
#KarnatakaQuotaWar | The Congress government has given 4% reservation to the Muslims. This was against the constitution, hence Bommai ji removed it and gave 2-2 to Lingayats and Vokkaligas: Dr Sudha R Halkai, BJP #SensationalSouth | @harishupadhya https://t.co/X4vUc59Eva